Stars are the largest single item
Stars make up just over a quarter of the whole catalogue, more than any other single metric, and every star listing needs the repository URL rather than a personal one.
Loading HstockPlus
GitHub splits along the same line as most platforms in this category: a repository and a profile are different targets, and a listing built for one has nothing to deliver against the other. Stars, forks, watch-style notifications, saved-to-list adds and written comments all attach to a repository. Followers attach to your account instead. Buy GitHub stars against a repository URL, and buy GitHub followers against your profile URL, and do not expect either to fill the other kind of order.
Stars make up just over a quarter of the whole catalogue, more than any other single metric, and every star listing needs the repository URL rather than a personal one.
Buy GitHub forks against the same repository URL as a star listing, but treat the two as separate metrics: forks sit at the low end of this catalogue by listing count and are not interchangeable with stars.
Buy GitHub stars, forks, watch-style notifications or saved-list adds when a repository is the target, or buy GitHub followers when your account page is the target. Pasting a repository link into a follower order, or a profile link into a star order, leaves the supplier nothing to act on.
A private repository gives a supplier nothing to star or fork, and renaming a repository mid-order can strand a delivery in progress. Both problems show the same way: an order marked complete with the count unchanged.
Buy GitHub issue comments only after reading what will actually be posted: some rows accept your own wording and some use the supplier's, and a few state whether the account writing it appears male or female. A comment stays on the thread and is visible to anyone reading it, so check this before ordering.
Nothing on this page needs a personal access token, an OAuth authorization, or your GitHub password. Every listing works from a public URL, and pasting the wrong kind is the most common reason an order sits without moving.
The repository URL, kept public for the whole delivery window stated on the listing.
Your own profile URL. A repository link will not fill a follower order even when you own both.
The direct link to the issue or pull request for written text, or the repository URL for the watch-style subscriber count. Custom-comment listings also want your text ready in advance.
Three shops carry GitHub listings here, and which one wrote a listing explains more of the price than which metric it sells. The rate for stars, forks and followers alike sits far lower on one shop's plain lines than on the other shop's ad-driven ones for the exact same metric.
| Shop line | Covers | Pacing | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| The "REAL FROM ADS" shop | Stars, forks, followers, notifications, saved-list adds, upvotes, comments and quote replies | Drip-fed on most of its rows, a stated 24 to 48 hour completion window | The broadest metric range on the page, and the highest rate for stars, forks and followers alike |
| The "Real User" shop | Stars, forks and followers only | The base line ships in one block; the pricier "Refill" labelled tiers add drip-feed pacing over a longer window instead of an actual refill | The lowest rate on the page for the same three metrics |
| The single third-shop listing | One generic likes/rate line | Drip-fed | Only one listing from this shop, too small a sample to generalize from |
A star, fork or follower count bought here is a number moved, and nothing more. Developers and hiring managers read a repository's star count as a signal of real use, and a count that does not match a repository's actual activity undermines exactly that signal rather than strengthening it. GitHub's acceptable use policies prohibit inauthentic activity, including paid stars and follows, and the risk of action against the account or the repository sits with the buyer rather than the supplier or this marketplace. Nothing sold here affects GitHub Trending or any ranking or discovery mechanism GitHub runs.
With a little over twenty entries in total, reading every row costs less time than sorting by price and hoping the cheapest one fits.
Stars, profile followers, and comments or quote replies together account for close to seven in ten of the current listings. Forks and five one-off lines, covering notifications, saved-list adds, upvotes, repository subscribers and a generic likes line, make up the rest.
Custom and gendered comment lines post exactly the words supplied, on a thread anyone can read afterward. Read what will actually be posted before ordering, since a comment cannot be quietly withdrawn the way a count can be.
Most listings here spread delivery instead of sending an order in one block, which reads closer to organic activity on a repository than a single large jump does.
Six listings are titled with a 30, 90 or 180 day refill window, all from the same shop, and none of the six carries the stored refill flag. Read that title as a pacing tier rather than a stored guarantee.
These fields decide whether a listing actually fits the repository or profile you are growing.
The public repository URL, kept public and under its current name for the whole delivery window. Followers need your profile URL instead, and comment or quote-reply rows need the specific issue or pull request link. No listing here asks for a personal access token, an OAuth authorization or your password, so treat any such request as a reason to stop and contact support with your order ID.
Only one listing does: a bundle that adds stars and saves the repository to a list at the same time. Everything else sells one metric per listing, so buy GitHub stars and forks as two separate orders against the same repository URL unless that specific bundle listing fits what you want.
GitHub currently carries 23 active listings across 3 shops, the smallest catalogue in this category. Two shops between them supply almost all of it, and the third holds a single listing. A catalogue this size is worth reading end to end rather than sorting by price, since a cheaper-looking row can come from a shop that does not carry the metric you actually want.
A star is a bookmark on the repository header. A fork copies the repository into a new one under another account. A follower attaches to your profile rather than to any repository. All three are separate counts sold as separate listings, and a listing built for one has nothing to deliver against a link meant for another.
On some rows. A plain custom-comment line and male- or female-voiced variants of it accept your own wording, an emoji-reaction line and a quote-reply line use fixed formats instead. Whatever gets posted stays on the issue or pull request and is visible to anyone reading the thread afterward, so read the listing carefully before ordering.
Not as a stored guarantee. Six listings, all followers or stars from the same shop, carry that wording in the title, and none of them, or any other listing on this page, has the refill flag set. What the higher price on those six buys is drip-fed pacing over a longer window, which is a real difference worth having, just not the same thing the title implies.
No listing here names a specific country. GitHub growth services are organized around the repository or the profile rather than geography, unlike the consumer platforms elsewhere in this category where country-targeted listings are common.
No. GitHub decides what it surfaces there on its own signals, and nothing sold on this page reaches that mechanism. Buy GitHub stars so a new repository does not sit at zero while you promote it elsewhere, and treat the count as a number moved rather than a route to Trending.
GitHub's acceptable use policies prohibit inauthentic activity, which covers paid stars and follows, and an account or repository can face action over it. That risk sits with the buyer rather than with the supplier or with this marketplace. A star count that does not match a repository's real activity also undermines the exact signal developers and hiring managers read stars for, which is worth weighing before ordering regardless of the policy question.
No. Three shops carry GitHub listings here, and they price the same metric very differently: one shop runs its lines noticeably lower for stars, forks and followers, while a second shop covers a wider range of metrics at a higher rate with a stated completion window in every title. Read the shop behind a listing, not only its price, before ordering.
Compare the current listings by metric, shop, per-1,000 rate, minimum and stated completion window, then point the order at your repository or your profile.
Buy GitHub stars for a repository, or order forks, profile followers and issue comments from the same small catalogue. This is the smallest catalogue in this pipeline so far, a little over twenty listings split between two shops with very different prices for the same metric, and every order runs against a public repository or profile URL rather than a password or access token.